Peer Review

Peer review

In the first read we can appreciate that the article is well structured and has a concept precision and specification allowing to the reader to get the correct idea quickly without many readings of the same paragraph.

The subjects are consistent with the conclusions means the writing of the text is coherent and cohesive, we can see this if we pay attention to the way people learn, some important things about the language encourage by tasks and other exercises and at the end of the article the author says that besides the improvement that means this technique “is still in its infancy”

One of the main issues of the text is that the extension is really short so it has some holes in the information specifically for an ignorant reader, maybe the writer could use some more words to expose the ideas or with more examples, they could give a better picture of what is planted on the article.

In the 6^th paragraph the writer uses way too many paraphrases so it makes the paragraph itself hard to read because it requires that the reader go for another paper to fully understand this article.

Greetings.

Karla Gallegos

Matías Barría